4.7 Article

Site of Action of Brain Neurosteroid Pregnenolone Sulfate at the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 40, Issue 31, Pages 5922-5936

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3010-19.2020

Keywords

glutamate receptors; neurosteroids; patch clamp; structure

Categories

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [17-02300S, 20-179458, 16-03913Y]
  2. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TN01000013]
  3. Charles University Grant Agency [1676119]
  4. ERDF/ESF project PharmaBrain [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007444]
  5. Research Project of the AS CR [RVO 67985823, RVO 61388963]
  6. Biotechnology and Biomedicine Center of Academy of Sciences
  7. Charles University (Vestec) from European Regional Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction has been implicated in several neurodevelopmental disorders. NMDAR function can be augmented by positive allosteric modulators, including endogenous compounds, such as cholesterol and neurosteroid pregnenolone sulfate (PES). Here we report that PES accesses the receptor via the membrane, and its binding site is different from that of cholesterol. Alanine mutagenesis has identified residues that disrupt the steroid potentiating effect at the rat GluN1 (G638; I642) and GluN2B (W559; M562; Y823; M824) subunit. Molecular dynamics simulation indicates that, in the absence of PES, the GluN2B M1 helix residue W559 interacts with the M4 helix residue M824. In the presence of PES, the M1 and M4 helices of agonist-activated receptor rearrange, forming a tighter interaction with the GluN1 M3 helix residues G638 and I642. This stabilizes the open-state position of the GluN1 M3 helices. Together, our data identify a likely binding site for the NMDAR-positive allosteric modulator PES and describe a novel molecular mechanism by which NMDAR activity can be augmented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available