4.7 Article

Neuroendocrine Mechanisms Governing Sex Differences in Hyperalgesic Priming Involve Prolactin Receptor Sensory Neuron Signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 40, Issue 37, Pages 7080-7090

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1499-20.2020

Keywords

estrogen; nociceptor; prolactin; sex dimorphism; testosterone; translation regulation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health [NS102161, NS065926, NS113457]
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM112747]
  3. University of Texas BRAIN Pilot Program [1503083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many clinical and preclinical studies report higher prevalence and severity of chronic pain in females. We used hyperalgesic priming with interleukin 6 (IL-6) priming and PGE(2) as a second stimulus as a model for pain chronicity. Intraplantar IL-6 induced hypersensitivity was similar in magnitude and duration in both males and females, while both paw and intrathecal PGE(2) hypersensitivity was more persistent in females. This difference in PGE(2) response was dependent on both circulating estrogen and translation regulation signaling in the spinal cord. In males, the duration of hypersensitivity was regulated by testosterone. Since the prolactin receptor (Prlr) is regulated by reproductive hormones and is female-selectively activated in sensory neurons, we evaluated whether Prlr signaling contributes to hyperalgesic priming. Using Delta PRL, a competitive Prlr antagonist, and a mouse line with ablated Prlr in the Nav1.8 sensory neuronal population, we show that Prlr in sensory neurons is necessary for the development of hyperalgesic priming in female, but not male, mice. Overall, sex-specific mechanisms in the initiation and maintenance of chronic pain are regulated by the neuroendocrine system and, specifically, sensory neuronal Prlr signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available