4.7 Article

The European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson's Disease: translation for non-English speaking countries

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 268, Issue 1, Pages 214-218

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10132-x

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson's Disease; Physiotherapy; Translation; Implementation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides practical steps on how to translate the European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson's Disease, using the Portuguese version as an example. Ten recommended translation steps were defined, including expert review, backward translation, review, final draft, etc. The need for detailed and multifaceted translation process was demonstrated by the additional adjustments required for the Portuguese version.
Background The use of the European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson's Disease is limited in countries where the official language is not English. Objective To provide practical steps on how to translate the European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson's Disease. Methods We used the translation process of the Portuguese version as an example of how to define the recommended steps. A combination of a forward-backward-translation and dual-panel approach was used. Results Ten recommended translation steps were defined: (1) authorization, (2) translation of sample chapter, (3) physiotherapy expert panel review, (4) backward translation, (5) approval by copyright holders, (6) translation of the remaining sections of the guideline, (7) review of the entire translation by expert panel, (8) review by a user panel, (9) conclude final draft, (10) publication and dissemination. Several adjustments were needed in the Portuguese version. Conclusion The additional adjustments that were required for the Portuguese version justify the need for the detailed and multifaceted translation process that was outlined in this manuscript.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available