4.7 Article

A carbon molecular sieve membrane-based reactive separation process for pre-combustion CO2 capture

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 605, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118028

Keywords

Membrane reactor; Adsorptive reactor; Water gas shift reaction; Carbon molecular sieve membrane

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [FE0026423, F0037137]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We discuss here a hybrid system combining a membrane reactor (MR) and an adsorptive reactor (AR), with the MR's reject stream serving as the AR's feed. We apply this system for the water gas shift (WGS) reaction for H-2 generation and simultaneous CO2 capture in the context of the Integrated Gas Combined Cycle (IGCC) process for power generation from coal and biomass. This MR-AR system attains a high conversion exceeding equilibrium, produces a pure H-2 product for power generation, and delivers a high-pressure CO2 stream ready for sequestration. Specifically, in our study we use carbon molecular sieve membranes (CMSMs) and a commercial sour-shift WGS catalyst. Lab experiments were carried-out to determine the membrane characteristics, and the MR performance under IGCC-relevant conditions, i.e., for temperatures up to 250 degrees C and pressures up to 25 bar, employing a model coal gasifier syngas. The CMSM and the catalyst have displayed robust and stable performance during a long-term run (similar to 750 h of syngas exposure). We evaluated the MR-AR system in multi-cycle runs and it has demonstrated superior performance to that of a conventional packed-bed reactor, producing a high-purity H2 product directly useable in a turbine for power generation. We conclude from the study, that the CMSM-based MR-AR system is a good candidate technology for environmentally-benign power generation. We are currently constructing a pilot-scale system for field demonstration of the technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available