4.7 Review

Vitamin D insufficiency as a potential culprit in critical COVID-19 patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 733-740

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26360

Keywords

COVID-19; meta-analysis; outcome; SARS-CoV-2; vitamin D

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that serum vitamin D levels may be associated with the prognosis of COVID-19. Diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency could assist in assessing patients' potential for developing severe COVID-19, and appropriate preventative and/or therapeutic interventions may improve COVID-19 outcomes.
Background As an immune modulator, vitamin D has been implicated in the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outcome. We aim to systematically explore the association of vitamin D serum levels with COVID-19 severity and prognosis. Methods The standardized mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to estimate pooled results from six studies. The prognostic performance of vitamin D serum levels for predicting adverse outcomes with detection of the best cutoff threshold was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Decision tree analysis by combining vitamin D levels and clinical features was applied to predict severity in COVID-19 patients. Results Mean vitamin D serum level of 376 patients, was 21.9 nmol/L (95% CI = 15.36-28.45). Significant heterogeneity was found (I-2 = 99.1%,p < .001). Patients with poor prognosis (N = 150) had significantly lower serum levels of vitamin D compared with those with good prognosis (N = 161), representing an adjusted standardized mean difference of -0.58 (95% Cl = -0.83 to -0.34,p < .001). Conclusion Serum vitamin D levels could be implicated in the COVID-19 prognosis. Diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency could be a helpful adjunct in assessing patients' potential of developing severe COVID-19. Appropriate preventative and/or therapeutic intervention may improve COVID-19 outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available