4.6 Article

Energy-Based Approach to Assess the Performance of a Granular Matrix Consisting of Recycled Rubber, Steel-Furnace Slag, and Coal Wash

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003239

Keywords

Steel furnace slag; Coal wash; Rubber crumbs; Large-scale cyclic testing; Energy distribution; Subballast; Ballast breakage

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Project (ARC-DP)
  2. ARC Industry Transformation Training Centre for Advanced Rail Track Technologies (ITTC-Rail)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ballasted track progressively deteriorates due to ballast degradation and track deformation under dynamic loading, and this process accelerates when train speeds increase and axle loads become heavier as the railways are seeking to serve the enhanced productivity of the mining and agriculture sectors; on this basis, improving track performance is imperative. One effective solution is to incorporate energy-absorbing materials in the rail track, particularly when these materials are recycled from mining waste and recycled rubber. In this paper the performance of the track specimen with a synthetic energy absorbing layer (SEAL) (i.e., a matrix of recycled rubber crumbs with mining waste) is investigated by a series of large-scale (prototype) cubical triaxial tests. The test results indicate that the inclusion of rubber inside the SEAL matrix has a significant influence on the lateral movement, vertical deformation, ballast degradation, and energy distribution of the track specimen. To facilitate a better understanding of the energy-absorbing mechanism with the addition of rubber, an energy-based analysis has been adopted to identify the critical amount of rubber crumbs needed to efficiently distribute the accumulated energy, hence improve track performance. It is shown that adding 10% of rubber into the SEAL matrix will provide superior performance with less ballast breakage, less vibration (as reflected by the elastic energy), and comparable settlement compared to traditional track.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available