4.3 Article

Ultra-low noise graphene/copper/nylon fabric for electromagnetic interference shielding in ultra-low field magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106775

Keywords

Ultra-low field; Magnetic resonance imaging; Superconducting quantum interference device; Electromagnetic interference shielding; Graphene

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11874378]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19511107100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging (ULF MRI) working in the micro-tesla magnetic field range, the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) as the signal detector is very susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI) so that the system normally works in a shielded room. However, the leakage of EMI in the shielded room may still seriously reduce the system performance. In order to improve the electromagnetic compatibility of the system, we designed a microwave absorbing composite, graphene/Cu/nylon fabric (GCN fabric). In this design, high shielding effectiveness and low-noise performance of the EMI shielding material are equally crucial due to the extremely sensitive detection with SQUID. The shielding effectiveness of 5-layer fabric ranges between 30 dB and 67 dB from 30 MHz to 3 GHz and its maximum appears at 60 MHz. Furthermore, GCN fabric introduces little extra system noise when applied in the ULF MRI system with magnetic field noise of 0.8 fT/root Hz at 5 kHz. The SQUID unlocked tuned signal is thus increased by 33% and the signal-to-noise ratio of MRI image is increased by a factor of 4.3. In future, portable and inexpensive unshielded ULF MRI with low-noise might be realized by potential optimization on the component and preparation technology of GCN fabric. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available