4.7 Article

Modeling and Assessing Connectivity Services Performance in a Sandbox Domain

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 3180-3189

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2020.2975641

Keywords

Network automation; performance modeling; sandbox domain

Funding

  1. EC through the METROHAUL [761727]
  2. Spanish MINECO/FEDER TWINS Project [TEC2017-90097-R]
  3. Catalan Institution for Research andAdvanced Studies
  4. Spanish MINECO/FEDER TRAFICA Project [TEC2015-69417-C2-1-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The automation of Network Services (NS) consisting of virtual functions connected through a multilayer packet-over-optical network requires predictable Quality of Service (QoS) performance, measured in terms of throughput and latency, to allow making proactive decisions. QoS is typically guaranteed by overprovisioning capacity dedicated to the NS, which increases costs for customers and network operators, especially when the traffic generated by the users and/or the virtual functions highly varies over the time. This article presents the PILOT methodology for modeling the performance of connectivity services during commissioning testing in terms of throughput and latency. Benefits are double: first, an accurate per-connection model allows operators to better operate their networks and reduce the need for overprovisioning; and second, customers can tune their applications to the performance characteristics of the connectivity. PILOT runs in a sandbox domain and constructs a scenario where an efficient traffic flow simulation environment, based on the CURSA-SQ model, is used to generate large amounts of data for Machine Learning (ML) model training and validation. The simulation scenario is tuned using real measurements of the connection (including throughput and latency) obtained from a set of active probes in the operator network. PILOT has been experimentally validated on a distributed testbed connecting UPC and Telefonica premises.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available