4.5 Article

Association analysis between HFM1 variation and primary ovarian insufficiency in Chinese women

Journal

CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages 597-602

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12718

Keywords

gene; HFM1; primary ovarian insufficiency; variation

Funding

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  2. ational Natural Science Foundation of China [81401175]
  3. Jiangsu Province Women and Children Health Program [FXK201201, FRC201201]
  4. 973 National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB529601, 2013CB945404]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HFM1 is a meiosis-specific gene and expressed in germ-line tissues. More recently, evidence has indicated that variations in HFM1 gene could be causative for primary ovarian insufficiency (POI), also known as premature ovarian failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between HFM1 gene variants and sporadic POI in Chinese women. A total of 138 POI patients and 316 healthy controls (matched for ethnic background, sex, and age of the patients) were recruited in this study. We screened the entire HFM1 coding region by direct sequencing in all subjects and identified six variants of HFM1 gene in POI group, namely c.148G>A/p.Glu50Lys, c.1241A>C/p.His414Pro, c.2325C>A/p.Phe775Leu, c.3367T>C/p.Ser1123Pro, c.3580C>T/p.Arg1194Cys, and c.1686-1G>C. The variation rate of HFM1 in POI group is significantly higher than control group (p < 0.01). The p.His414Pro and p.Arg1194Cys were predicted to be probably damaging to the HFM1 protein function, while p.Glu50Lys, p.Phe775Leu and p.Ser1123Pro mutants might not have any deleterious effect on the structure or function of the protein by online predictors. Taken together, our data suggested that HFM1 gene might be associated with primary ovarian insufficiency in Chinese population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available