4.4 Article

Twin-driven actuator with multi-layered disc magnetorheological fluid clutches for haptics

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X20943958

Keywords

magnetorheological fluid; clutch; twin-driven actuator; haptics

Funding

  1. Innovative Science and Technology Initiative for Security, ATLA, Japan [JPJ004596]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed a new structure of a magnetorheological fluid-based actuator suitable for haptic devices and evaluated its performance through experiments. The results showed that 132DG is a better material for force control compared to other magnetorheological fluids. Two types of twin-driven magnetorheological fluid actuators (link type and belt type) were compared, with the belt-type actuator being more suitable for large range motion and the link-type actuator being better for accurate torque control.
Magnetorheological fluids are composite materials made of ferromagnetic particles, medium oils, and several types of additives. We have developed actuation systems for the fine haptic control of master-slave robots. In this study, we proposed a new structure of a magnetorheological fluid-based actuator suitable for haptic devices. For the basic structure of the actuator, we proposed a twin-driven magnetorheological fluid actuator using two multi-layered disc-type magnetorheological fluid clutches for haptics. We conducted performance measures for the magnetorheological fluid clutches for haptics with three commercially available magnetorheological fluids (i.e. 122EG, 132DG, and 140CG from Lord Corp.). The experimental results show that 132DG is a better material for force control. Then, we proposed two types of twin-driven magnetorheological fluid actuators (i.e. link type and belt type) and compared their performance. The results show that the averages of the time constant are 19.1 and 16.1 ms for the link type and belt type, respectively. Furthermore, the averages of torque error are 0.033 and 0.068 N m for the link type and belt type, respectively. However, the belt-type twin-driven magnetorheological fluid actuator is better if a large range of motion is required, while the link-type twin-driven magnetorheological fluid actuator is better if accurate torque control is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available