4.4 Review

Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model

Rate this paper

The primary rating indicates the level of overall quality for the paper. Secondary ratings independently reflect strengths or weaknesses of the paper.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started