4.7 Review

Clinical Trials of Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention: A Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 223, Issue 3, Pages 370-380

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa377

Keywords

monoclonal antibodies; broadly neutralizing antibodies; HIV; clinical trials

Funding

  1. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership [RIA2017S]
  2. South African Medical Research Council's Special Initiative on HIV Prevention Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Passive immunization with bnAbs shows potential in reducing global HIV infections, with newly developed highly potent bnAbs showing promise for HIV prevention. Published data indicate these antibodies are safe and effective, and if proven to be successful, could have a positive impact on HIV vaccine development.
Passive immunization with broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) is a promising approach to reduce the 1.7 million annual human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections globally. Early studies on bnAbs showed safety in humans, but short elimination half-lives and low potency and breadth. Since 2010, several new highly potent bnAbs have been assessed in clinical trials alone or in combination for HIV prevention. Published data indicate that these bnAbs are safe and have a half-life ranging from 15 to 71 days. Only intravenous VRC01 has advanced to an efficacy trial, with results expected in late 2020. If bnAbs are shown to be effective in preventing HIV infection, they could fast-track vaccine development as correlates of protection, and contribute as passive immunization to achieving the goal of epidemic control. The purpose of the current review is to describe the current status and provide a synopsis of the available data on bnAbs in clinical trials for HIV prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available