Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Can Defense Attorneys Detect Forensic Confirmation Bias? Effects on Evidentiary Judgments and Trial Strategies
Nikoeta M. Despodova et al.
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (2020)
The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices
Claire A. J. van den Eeden et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2019)
How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence
William C. Thompson et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2019)
Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science
Gianni Ribeiro et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2019)
Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
Brett O. Gardner et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2019)
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review
Glinda S. Cooper et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2019)
What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
Brett O. Gardner et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2019)
The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence
Gregory Mitchell et al.
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW (2019)
Variations in Reliability and Validity Do Not Influence Judge, Attorney, and Mock Juror Decisions About Psychological Expert Evidence
Jacqueline Austin Chorn et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2019)
Biases in forensic experts
Itiel E. Dror
SCIENCE (2018)
Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility
A. McCarthy Wilcox et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2018)
Cognitive Bias in Forensic Mental Health Assessment: Evaluator Beliefs About Its Nature and Scope
Patricia A. Zapf et al.
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW (2018)
From the Fundamental Attribution Error to the Truly Fundamental Attribution Error and Beyond: My Research Journey
Lee Ross
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results
Sarah V. Stevenage et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2017)
Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners
Jeff Kukucka et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION (2017)
Addressing potential observer effects in forensic science: a perspective from a forensic scientist who uses linear sequential unmasking techniques
Glenn Langenburg
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2017)
Context Effects in Forensic Entomology and Use of Sequential Unmasking in Casework
Melanie S. Archer et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2016)
Bloodstain pattern classification: Accuracy, effect of contextual information and the role of analyst characteristics
Nikola K. P. Osborne et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2016)
Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination
E. J. A. T. Mattijssen et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2016)
Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information
Claire A. J. van den Eeden et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2016)
Lost Proof of Innocence: The Impact of Confessions on Alibi Witnesses
Stephanie B. Marion et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2016)
The Perfect Match: Do Criminal Stereotypes Bias Forensic Evidence Analysis?
Laura Smalarz et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2016)
Science, Technology, or the Expert Witness: What Influences Jurors' Judgments About Forensic Science Testimony?
Jonathan J. Koehler et al.
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW (2016)
Letter to the Editor-Context Management Toolbox: A Linear Sequential Unmasking (LSU) Approach for Minimizing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decision Making
Itiel E. Dror et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2015)
Cross-Examination Educates Jurors About Missing Control Groups in Scientific Evidence
Jacqueline L. Austin et al.
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW (2015)
Bias among forensic document examiners: Still a need for procedural changes
Reinoud D. Stoel et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2014)
Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?
Nikola K. P. Osborne et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2014)
Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
Sherry Nakhaeizadeh et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2014)
Do Confessions Taint Perceptions of Handwriting Evidence? An Empirical Test of the Forensic Confirmation Bias
Jeff Kukucka et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2014)
Effect of systematic dental shape modification in bitemarks
Hannah Holtkoetter et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments
Peter A. F. Fraser-Mackenzie et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2013)
The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework
Bryan Found et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2013)
The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
Saul M. Kassin et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION (2013)
Why Confessions Trump Innocence
Saul M. Kassin
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2012)
Harmless Error Analysis: How Do Judges Respond to Confession Errors?
D. Brian Wallace et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2012)
Confessions That Corrupt: Evidence From the DNA Exoneration Case Files
Saul M. Kassin et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?
William C. Thompson
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2011)
A study of multiple bitemarks inflicted in human skin by a single dentition using geometric morphometric analysis
Mary A. Bush et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2011)
Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: Inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison
Itiel E. Dror et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2011)
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions
Bradford T. Ulery et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2011)
Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
Itiel E. Dror et al.
SCIENCE & JUSTICE (2011)
Expert Psychological Testimony
Brian L. Cutler et al.
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony
Jonathan J. Koehler
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES (2011)
Identifying Fingerprint Expertise
Jason M. Tangen et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
The use of technology in human expert domains: challenges and risks arising from the use of automated fingerprint identification systems in forensic science
I. E. Dror et al.
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK (2010)
I Spy with My Little Eye: Jurors' Detection of Internal Validity Threats in Expert Evidence
Bradley D. McAuliff et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2010)
Biomechanical Factors in Human Dermal Bitemarks in a Cadaver Model
Mary A. Bush et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2009)
Uniqueness of the Dentition as Impressed in Human Skin: A Cadaver Model
Raymond G. Miller et al.
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES (2009)
The Testimony of Forensic Identification Science: What Expert Witnesses Say and What Factfinders Hear
Dawn McQuiston-Surrett et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2009)
Can Jurors Recognize Missing Control Groups, Confounds, and Experimenter Bias in Psychological Science?
Bradley D. McAuliff et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2009)
On the Presumption of Evidentiary Independence: Can Confessions Corrupt Eyewitness Identifications?
Lisa E. Hasel et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2009)
The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making
Jeffrey S. Neuschatz et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2008)
Juror need for cognition and sensitivity to methodological flaws in expert evidence
Bradley D. McAuliff et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2008)
Gold versus platinum - Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?
Joel D. Lieberman et al.
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW (2008)
Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications
IE Dror et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2006)
The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others
E Pronin et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN (2002)
Asking the gatekeepers:: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world
SI Gatowski et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2001)
Share Paper
