4.4 Article

Scoring system for the diagnosis of bilateral primary aldosteronism in the outpatient setting before adrenal venous sampling

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages 467-472

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.13278

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe only reliable method for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA) is adrenal venous sampling (AVS), which is costly and time-consuming. Considering the limited availability of AVS, it would be helpful to obtain information on the diagnosis of bilateral hyperaldosteronism (BHA) from routine tests. We aimed to establish new, simple criteria for outpatients to diagnose BHA from PA before AVS. DesignWe retrospectively analysed 82 patients who were diagnosed with PA and underwent AVS. Thirty-seven patients were diagnosed with unilateral hyperaldosteronism (UHA), and 36 with BHA and nine were undetermined. Among the variables that were significantly different between UHA and BHA in the univariate analysis, we chose three variables to be included in multivariate logistic regression models and constructed a subtype prediction score. ResultsThe subtype prediction score was calculated as follows: 3 points for no adrenal nodules on computed tomography imaging, 2 for serum potassium of 35 mmol/l and 2 for aldosterone-to-renin ratio of <490 after a captopril challenge test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the ability to discriminate BHA from UHA showed that a score of 7 points had 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity and a score of 5 points had 67% sensitivity and 94% specificity (area under the curve: 0922; 95% CI: 0863-0980). ConclusionsOur new, simple criteria specifically distinguished BHA from UHA in the outpatient setting before AVS. Furthermore, not only endocrinologists but also general internists can use this convenient, safe scoring system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available