4.7 Article

Membrane budding is a major mechanism of in vivo platelet biogenesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 217, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20191206

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Stem Cells Australia program
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [1128993, 1129012, 1113577]
  3. National Health andMedical Research Council [361646]
  4. Australian Cancer Research Foundation
  5. State Government of Victoria Operational Infrastructure Support
  6. Australian Research Council Strategic Research Australian Postgraduate Award studentship
  7. Lorenzo and Pamela Galli Charitable Trust
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1129012, 1128993] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How platelets are produced by megakaryocytes in vivo remains controversial despite more than a century of investigation. Megakaryocytes readily produce proplatelet structures in vitro; however, visualization of platelet release from proplatelets in vivo has remained elusive. We show that within the native prenatal and adult environments, the frequency and rate of proplatelet formation is incompatible with the physiological demands of platelet replacement. We resolve this inconsistency by performing in-depth analysis of plasma membrane budding, a cellular process that has previously been dismissed as a source of platelet production. Our studies demonstrate that membrane budding results in the sustained release of platelets directly into the peripheral circulation during both fetal and adult life without induction of cell death or proplatelet formation. In support of this model, we demonstrate that in mice deficient for NF-E2 (the thrombopoietic master regulator), the absence of membrane budding correlates with failure of in vivo platelet production. Accordingly, we propose that membrane budding, rather than proplatelet formation, supplies the majority of the platelet biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available