4.5 Article

Anomaly Detection in High-Dimensional Data

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 360-374

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2020.1807997

Keywords

Extreme value theory; High-dimensional data; Nearest neighbor searching; Temporal data; Unsupervised outlier detection

Funding

  1. Monash eResearch Centre
  2. Monash eSolutions-Research Support Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article introduces an algorithm for detecting anomalies in high-dimensional data, addressing limitations of the HDoutliers algorithm to improve performance, and demonstrates its wide applicability on various datasets.
The HDoutliers algorithm is a powerful unsupervised algorithm for detecting anomalies in high-dimensional data, with a strong theoretical foundation. However, it suffers from some limitations that significantly hinder its performance level, under certain circumstances. In this article, we propose an algorithm that addresses these limitations. We define an anomaly as an observation where itsk-nearest neighbor distance with the maximum gap is significantly different from what we would expect if the distribution ofk-nearest neighbors with the maximum gap is in the maximum domain of attraction of the Gumbel distribution. An approach based on extreme value theory is used for the anomalous threshold calculation. Using various synthetic and real datasets, we demonstrate the wide applicability and usefulness of our algorithm, which we call the stray algorithm. We also demonstrate how this algorithm can assist in detecting anomalies present in other data structures using feature engineering. We show the situations where the stray algorithm outperforms the HDoutliers algorithm both in accuracy and computational time. This framework is implemented in the open source R package stray.for this article are available online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available