4.7 Article

Analysis of Base-Position Error Rate of Next-Generation Sequencing to Detect Tumor Mutations in Circulating DNA

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue 11, Pages 1492-1503

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.258236

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sites de Recherche Integre sur le Cancer (SIRIC) <>
  2. INSERM [PC201423]
  3. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  4. Universite Paris-Descartes
  5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  6. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR Nanobiotechnologies) [ANR-10-NANO-0002-09]
  8. canceropole [2011-1-LABEL-UP5-2]
  9. Ligue contre le cancer (Program Equipe labelisee LIGUE) [EL2016.LNCC/VaT]
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-NANO-0002] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Detecting single-nucleotide variations and insertions/deletions in circulating tumor DNA is challenging because of their low allele frequency. The clinical use of circulating tumor DNA to characterize tumor genetic alterations requires new methods based on next-generation sequencing. METHODS: We developed a method based on quantification of error rate of each base position [position error rate (PER)]. To identify mutations, a binomial test was used to compare the minor-allele frequency to the measured PER at each base position. This process was validated in control samples and in 373 plasma samples from patients with lung or pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Minimal mutated allele frequencies were 0.003 for single-nucleotide variations and 0.001 for insertions/deletions. Independent testing performed by droplet digital PCR (n = 231 plasma samples) showed strong agreement with the base-PER method (kappa = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted next-generation sequencing analyzed with the base-PER method represents a robust and low cost method to detect circulating tumor DNA in patients with cancer. (C) 2016 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available