4.7 Article

Variants in Homologous Recombination Genes EXO1 and RAD51 Related with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

Journal

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa505

Keywords

POI; DNA repair; EXO1; RAD51; whole exome sequencing

Funding

  1. National Key Research & Developmental Program of China [2017YFC1001100, 2018YFC1003400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571406, 81522018, 81771541, 31601198]
  3. Shandong University Education Foundation Public Welfare Project [23460047102008]
  4. Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shandong [ZR201702150261]
  5. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [JQ201605]
  6. Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province [2018GSF118219]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is characterized by cessation of menstruation before 40 years of age and elevated serum level of FSH (>25 IU/L). Recent studies have found a few causative genes responsible for POI enriched in meiotic recombination and DNA damage repair pathways. Objective: To investigate the role of variations in homologous recombination genes played in POI pathogenesis. Methods: The whole exome sequencing was performed in 50 POI patients with primary amenorrhea. Functional characterizations of the novel variants were carried out in budding yeast and human cell line. Results: We identified 8 missense variants in 7 homologous recombination genes, including EXO1, RAD51, RMI1, MSH5, MSH2, MSH6, and MLH1. The mutation p.Thr52Ser in EXO1 impaired the meiotic process of budding yeast and p.Glu68Gly in RAD51-altered protein localization in human cells, both of them impaired the efficiency of homologous recombination repair for DNA double-stranded breaks in human cells. Conclusions: Our study first linked the variants of EXO1 and RAD51 with POI and further highlighted the role of DNA repair genes in ovarian dysgenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available