Journal
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 264, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121553
Keywords
Phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs); Shallow border reservoir; Phytoplankton community succession; Environmental factors; Aquatic ecosystems
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [51721093]
- National Key R & D Program of China [2017YFC0404505]
- Water Resource Science and Technology Innovation Program of Guangdong Province [2016-10]
- Technology Demonstration Program of Ministry of Water Resources of China
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The community diversity of phytoplankton is quite high, and hundreds of phytoplankton species can coexist. Aggregating phytoplankton species into different phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs) can better assess and predict the potential structural and functional effects of aquatic ecosystems. The continuous interaction of key PFGs is the key cause of cyanobacterial blooms in drinking water supply systems, especially in shallow border reservoirs, but the reasons have not been understood. This study was carried out in Macau's two shallow border reservoirs, the Main Storage Reservoir (MSR) and Sai Pa Van Reservoir (SPVR). Then, phytoplankton samples from these reservoirs were collected monthly over a four-year period (from January 2011 to December 2014) to reveal key factors driving PFGs succession and their synthetic effects on the dominant species. The trophic state index (TSI) of TN and TP of the two reservoirs ranged from 36.25 to 83.95 and 8.32-56.13, respectively, indicating that the SPVR and MSR were between a eutrophic and hypereutrophic state. The phytoplankton analysis results showed that there were 14 dominant PFGs and 8 dominant PFGs in the MSR and SPVR, respectively. The group S-1 was always predominant in the SPVR during the succession of PFGs, while the succession of PFGs in the MSR were quite different, the PFGs could mainly be summarized as S-1/S-N/X-1 (2011) -> X-1/J/B/T-B/P (2012, 2013) /S-1/X-1/J (2014). In addition, redundancy analysis (RDA) through stepwise discriminant analysis was used to analyze the dominant PFGs and abiotic factors in both reservoirs. The results indicated that the turbidity value of the reservoir was the key factor influencing groups S-1, Lo and S-N in the SPVR. However, the different PFGs were influenced by the turbidity, NH3-N, NO3-N and EC values of the reservoir in the MSR. The relationship between PFGs and environmental factors was described by stepwise regression analysis. The investigation of the different ecological responses between the interconnected reservoirs was useful for targeted water source protection. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available