4.7 Article

Supply chain management approach for greenhouse and acidifying gases emission reduction towards construction materials industry: A case study from China

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 258, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120521

Keywords

Acidifying gas; Construction materials industry; Environmental evaluation method; Greenhouse gas; Supply chain

Funding

  1. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2010SCU22009]
  2. Scientific Research Staring Foundation of Sichuan University [2015SCU11034]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71601134]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The significant rise in greenhouse gas (GHG) and acidifying gas (AG) emissions have resulted in serious global warming and acidification problems, a major source of which are the emissions from construction materials. To reduce these adverse effects, it is vital that the overall environmental performances of construction materials supply chain networks (CMSCN) be evaluated and optimized. To this end, to fully consider the GHG and AG emissions, control total CMSCN costs, and determine a reasonable trade-off between economic development and environmental protection, this paper developed an innovative environmental evaluation method (EEM) nested in a multi-objective optimization model. The proposed approach was then applied to a practical case study in China to demonstrate its efficiency and effectiveness in controlling GHG greenhouse and AG acidification problems and mitigating ecological-economic conflicts. Scenario analyses were also conducted focused on cost control and problem attention ratios, after which some targeted conclusions and policy suggestions were given. By comprehensively considering both the environmental effects and the economic benefits, the proposed methodology was shown to efficiently control GHG and AG emissions, reduce costs, and provide practical guidance on the sustainable development of CMSCN. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available