4.7 Article

A deep neural network for molecular wave functions in quasi-atomic minimal basis representation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0012911

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skodowska-Curie Grant [792572]
  2. University of Warwick Research Development Fund
  3. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training of Mathematics for Real-World Systems [EP/L015374/1]
  4. UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship program [MR/S016023/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/P020232/1, EP/R029431/1, EP/S000356/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/P020232/1, EP/S000356/1, EP/R029431/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. UKRI [MR/S016023/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [792572] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emergence of machine learning methods in quantum chemistry provides new methods to revisit an old problem: Can the predictive accuracy of electronic structure calculations be decoupled from their numerical bottlenecks? Previous attempts to answer this question have, among other methods, given rise to semi-empirical quantum chemistry in minimal basis representation. We present an adaptation of the recently proposed SchNet for Orbitals (SchNOrb) deep convolutional neural network model [K. T. Schutt et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 5024 (2019)] for electronic wave functions in an optimized quasi-atomic minimal basis representation. For five organic molecules ranging from 5 to 13 heavy atoms, the model accurately predicts molecular orbital energies and wave functions and provides access to derived properties for chemical bonding analysis. Particularly for larger molecules, the model outperforms the original atomic-orbital-based SchNOrb method in terms of accuracy and scaling. We conclude by discussing the future potential of this approach in quantum chemical workflows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available