4.7 Article

Combination Epigenetic Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer with 5-Azacitidine and Entinostat: A Phase II National Cancer Institute/Stand Up to Cancer Study

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 2691-2701

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1729

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Stand Up To Cancer Epigenetics Dream Team (Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation)
  2. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, NCI [MCR-0019-P2C, U01 CA070095, UM1CA186691]
  3. Specialized Program Of Research Excellence in Breast Cancer [P50 CA88843]
  4. Microarray Core (NIH) [P30 CA006973]
  5. Analytical Pharmacology Core of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (NIH) [P30 CA006973, UL1 TR 001079]
  6. Shared Instrument grant [1S10RR026824-01]
  7. Clinical Protocol and Data Management facilities [P30 CA006973, P30CA 047904]
  8. Bioinformatics Core [P30 CA006973]
  9. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the NIH [UL1 TR 001079]
  10. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  11. Pennsylvania Department of Health
  12. QVC
  13. Fashion Footwear Association of New York (FFANY)
  14. Cindy Rosencrans Fund for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Research
  15. Lee Jeans
  16. Entertainment Industry Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: In breast cancer models, combination epigenetic therapy with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and a histone deacetylase inhibitor led to reexpression of genes encoding important therapeutic targets, including the estrogen receptor (ER). We conducted a multicenter phase II study of 5-azacitidine and entinostat in women with advanced hormone-resistant or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Experimental Design: Patients received 5-azacitidine 40 mg/m(2) (days 1-5, 8-10) and entinostat 7 mg (days 3, 10) on a 28-day cycle. Continuation of epigenetic therapy was offered with the addition of endocrine therapy at the time of progression [optional continuation (OC) phase]. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort. We hypothesized that ORR would be >= 20% against null of 5% using Simon two-stage design. At least one response was required in 1 of 13 patients per cohort to continue accrual to 27 per cohort (type I error, 4%; power, 90%). Results: There was one partial response among 27 women with hormone-resistant disease (ORR = 4%; 95% CI, 0-19), and none in 13 women with TNBC. One additional partial response was observed in the OC phase in the hormone-resistant cohort (n = 12). Mandatory tumor samples were obtained pre- and posttreatment (58% paired) with either up-or downregulation of ER observed in approximately 50% of posttreatment biopsies in the hormone-resistant, but not TNBC cohort. Conclusions: Combination epigenetic therapy was well tolerated, but our primary endpoint was not met. OC phase results suggest that some women benefit from epigenetic therapy and/or reintroduction of endocrine therapy beyond progression, but further study is needed. (C) 2016 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available