4.6 Article

The transcriptional repressor BCL11A promotes breast cancer metastasis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 295, Issue 33, Pages 11707-11719

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014018

Keywords

breast cancer; metastasis; invasion; transcription; alternative splicing; B-cell leukemia; lymphoma 11A (BCL11A); muscleblind-like splicing regulator 1 (MBNL1); integrin-alpha 6 (ITGA6); gene regulation; gene transcription

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-14-1-0354]
  2. NIH [R01 CA206505]
  3. Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland [KL2 TR000440]
  4. University Hospitals Department of Medicine Team Science Award 2014
  5. Genomics Core Facility of the CWRU School of Medicine's Genetics and Genome Sciences Department

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phenotypes of each breast cancer subtype are defined by their transcriptomes. However, the transcription factors that regulate differential patterns of gene expression that contribute to specific disease outcomes are not well understood. Here, using gene silencing and overexpression approaches, RNA-Seq, and splicing analysis, we report that the transcription factor B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 11A (BCL11A) is highly expressed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and drives metastatic disease. Moreover, BCL11A promotes cancer cell invasion by suppressing the expression of muscleblind-like splicing regulator 1 (MBNL1), a splicing regulator that suppresses metastasis. This ultimately increases the levels of an alternatively spliced isoform of integrin-alpha 6 (ITGA6), which is associated with worse patient outcomes. These results suggest that BCL11A sustains TNBC cell invasion and metastatic growth by repressing MBNL1-directed splicing ofITGA6. Our findings also indicate that BCL11A lies at the interface of transcription and splicing and promotes aggressive TNBC phenotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available