4.3 Article

Multiscale building segmentation based on deep learning for remote sensing RGB images from different sensors

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.14.034503

Keywords

single RGB image; building footprint segmentation; multiscale data; deep learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Building footprint segmentation from satellite and aerial images is an essential and challenging step for high-resolution building map generation. In urban management applications, such as building monitoring, infrastructure development, smart three-dimensional cities, and building change detection, building footprints are required to generate precise multiscale building maps. An efficient deep learning-based segmentation approach is proposed for multiscale building footprint extraction, and the results are presented for the most important challenges in photogrammetry and remote sensing, including shadows and occluded areas, vegetation covers, complex roofs, dense building areas, oblique images, and the generalization capability in different locations. The proposed method includes new dilated convolutional blocks containing kernels with different sizes to learn spectral-spatial relationships in multiscale satellite and aerial images with a high level of abstraction. The quantitative assessments of multiscale images from different locations with different spatial resolutions and spectral details show that the average F1 score and the average intersection over union for extracted footprints are about 86% and 76%, respectively. Compared with the state-of-the-art approaches, the proposed method has outstanding generalization capability and provides better performance for building footprint segmentation from multisensor single images. (C) 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available