Journal
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0015188
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Science Foundation (NSF) [ECCS-1740270, 1740271]
- E2CDA-NRI Program of the Semiconductor Research Corporation [2764.001]
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research [AFOSR FA9550-18-1-0063, FA9550-19-1-0156]
- NY State Empire State Development's Division of Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR) through Focus Center-NY-RPI Contract [C150117]
- Los Alamos National Laboratory's Laboratory-Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Defects in epitaxial Ru(0001) films on c-plane sapphire, with nominal thicknesses of 10-80 nm, deposited at 350 degrees C and step-annealed to 950 degrees C, were characterized using transmission electron microscopy. The variation of Ru and sapphire lattice parameters with temperature is such that the misfit strain for the observed 30 degrees rotated-honeycomb epitaxial relationship is essentially constant with temperature at 1.5%, resulting in a biaxial stress of 10.0 GPa and an energy density of 150 MJm-3 in unrelaxed films. Stress relaxation occurs by the formation of defects. For the 20-80 nm thick films, the defects are a- and c-type dislocations and stacking faults, argued to be of I-2 type. In addition, the films show the surprising presence of {11 (2) over bar1}1/3 < 11 (2) over bar(6) over bar > deformation twins. The 10 nm-thick films were found to be defect free. The critical thickness for misfit strain relaxation via the formation of threading and misfit dislocations is computed as 7+2 nm, depending on the choice of the dislocation core radius. Energetic analysis of twin formation, using both the infinite-matrix and the finite-matrix (MoriTanaka) approaches, provides values of the twin aspect ratios, assumed to be ellipsoidal, and shows that the latter but not the former approach can qualitatively explain the formation of the observed twins. In addition to providing the maximum strain relief compared to other potential twin types, {11 (2) over bar1}1/3 < 11 (2) over bar(6) over bar > twins do not require lattice shuffles and have a boundary that is a special boundary, namely, a 35 degrees tilt boundary with a-type dislocations every other {0002} plane, that may also favor their formation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available