4.6 Article

The magnetostructural transition and magnetocaloric properties in Fe0.6Mn0.4NiSi1-xAlx alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0003261

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [51901079]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Opening Project of National Engineering Research Center for Powder Metallurgy of Titanium Rare Metals
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030313615, 2018A030310406]
  5. Zhongshan Municipal Science and Technology Program (Platform Construction and innovation Team) [2015F1FC00036, 2016F2FC0005, 2017G1FC0003]
  6. Zhongshan Collaborative Innovation Fund [2018C1001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Fe0.6Mn0.4NiSi1-xAlx (x=0, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.12) alloys were prepared by arc melting and annealed at 1073K for 90h. With increasing Al contents, the structure of Fe0.6Mn0.4NiSi1-xAlx changes from TiNiSi-type to Ni2In-type at room temperature, while the Curie temperature decreases from 390K to 136K. Although the refrigerant capacity is relatively small, about 126J/kg, the maximum isothermal entropy change reaches a value of -Delta S-max=52.9J/(kgK) under 5T for x=0.04. At the same time, the alloys have great corrosion resistance. From x=0 to 0.12, samples can be tuned from a second-order to a first-order and then to a second-order phase transition. It is worth noting that there is no magnetic hysteresis for all samples although they experience structural phase transition. The structural and magnetic phase diagrams of the Fe0.6Mn0.4NiSi1-xAlx system have been figured out. The results indicate that the relatively large magnetocaloric effects with no magnetic hysteresis and good corrosion resistance make these alloys a good candidate for magnetic refrigeration near room temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available