4.6 Article

Killing of bacterial spores by dodecylamine and its effects on spore inner membrane properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages 1511-1522

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/jam.14732

Keywords

antimicrobials; Bacillus; bacterial spores; disinfection; spores

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of Ca-dipicolinic acid (CaDPA), cortex-lytic enzymes (CLEs), the inner membrane (IM) CaDPA channel and coat on spore killing by dodecylamine. Methods and Results: Bacillus subtilisspores, wild-type, CaDPA-less due to the absence of DPA synthase or the IM CaDPA channel, or lacking CLEs, were dodecylamine-treated and spore viability and vital staining were all determined. Dodecylamine killed intact wild-type and CaDPA-lessB. subtilisspores similarly, and also killed intactClostridiodes difficilespores +/- CaDPA, with up to 99% killing with 1 mol l(-1)dodecylamine in 4 h at 45 degrees C with spores at similar to 10(8) ml(-1). Dodecylamine killing of decoated wild type and CLE-lessB. subtilisspores was similar, but similar to two-fold faster than for intact spores, and much faster for decoated CaDPA-less spores, with >= 99% killing in 5 min. Propidium iodide stained intact spores +/- CaDPA minimally, decoated CaDPA-replete spores or dodecylamine-killed CLE-less spores peripherally, and cores of decoated CaDPA-less spores and dodecylamine-killed intact spores with CLEs. The IM of some decoated CaDPA-less spores was greatly reorganized. Conclusions: Dodecylamine spore killing does not require CaDPA channels, CaDPA or CLEs. The lack of CaDPA in decoated spores allowed strong PI staining of the spore core, indicating loss of these spores IM permeability barrier. Significance and Impact of the Study: This work gives new information on killing bacterial spores by dodecylamine, and how spore IM's relative impermeability is maintained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available