4.7 Article

Hydrogen storage properties of Mn and Cu for Fe substitution in TiFe0.9 intermetallic compound

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 851, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156075

Keywords

Hydrogen storage; Intermetallic compound; TiFe; Substitution

Funding

  1. Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) [826352]
  2. European Union
  3. Hydrogen Europe and Hydrogen Europe Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that increasing Cu content leads to more secondary phase in the alloy, resulting in a harsher activation process. Substitution of Mn and Cu increases the cell parameter of TiFe, lowering the first plateau pressure and raising the second plateau pressure.
The present study investigates the partial substitutions of Mn and Cu for Fe in the TiFe-system to gain better understanding of the role of elemental substitution on its hydrogen storage properties. The TiFe0.88-xMn0.02Cux (x = 0, 0.02, 0.04) compositions were studied. From X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Electron Probe Micro-Analysis (EPMA), it was found that all alloys are multi-phase, with TiFe as a major phase, together with beta-Ti and Ti4Fe2O-type as secondary precipitates, of all them containing also Mn and Cu. Increasing the Cu content augments the secondary phase amounts. Low quantity of secondary phases helps the activation of the main TiFe phase for the first hydrogen absorption, but on increasing their amounts, harsher activation occurs. Both Mn and Cu substitutions increase the cell parameter of TiFe, thus decreasing the first plateau pressure. However, Cu substitution rises the second plateau pressure revealing the predominancy of electronic effects associated to this substitution. All samples have fast kinetics and high hydrogen capacity making these substituted compounds promising for large scale stationary applications. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available