4.7 Article

Microstructure and mechanical properties of Tix(AlCrVNb)100-x light weight multi-principal element alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 831, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154742

Keywords

TiAlCrVNb alloy; Light weight multi-principal element alloy; Density; Mechanical property; Strengthening mechanism

Funding

  1. City University of Hong Kong [9380088, 7005078, 9231348]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, ROC [MOST-105-2221-E-110-019-MY31, MOST 107-2218-E-008-015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Ti-x(AlCrVNb)(100-x) (x = 20, 40, 60 and 80) low-density multi-principal element alloys (MPEAs) were prepared by vacuum arc-melting. The density, crystal structure, microstructure and mechanical properties of this new Ti-x(AlCrVNb)(100-x) are reported. The density of alloys decreases with increasing Ti content from 5.81 to 4.79 g/cm(3). The microstructure of Ti20 consists of body-centered cubic (BCC) and minor amount of nano-sized particles segregating at grain boundaries, resulting in the brittleness of Ti20. But Ti40, Ti60 and Ti80 all consist of a single BCC solid solution phase. In addition, the experimentally observed phase constitutions are compared with the equilibrium and non-equilibrium thermodynamical modeling results. The compression yield strength decreases from 1122 MPa for Ti40 to 600 MPa for Ti80, due to the decreased atomic size difference. The combination of room-temperatured specific strength and ductility of Ti40 was found to be superior to most single-phase BCC MPEAs in the as-cast state. Promising room-temperature tensile properties were found for Ti60, better than those of most single-phase BCC MPEAs. The solid solution strengthening was found to be the dominant strengthening mechanism, making up more than 90% of the yield strength of Ti40-Ti80. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available