4.7 Article

Analysis of Cage Structured Halide Double Perovskites Cs2NaMCl6 (M = Ti, V) by Spin Polarized Calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 854, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156000

Keywords

Double perovskites; Exchange-correlation potential; Spintronics; Band gap; Thermoelectricity; Figure of merit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the structural, magneto-electronic, thermoelectric, and thermo-physical behavior of Cs2NaMCl6 double perovskites using DFT and post-DFT calculations. The materials exhibit half-metallic characteristics and potential for applications in spintronic and thermoelectric technologies.
The DFT and post-DFT calculations are performed to overview the structural, magneto-electronic, thermoelectric and thermo-physical behavior of Cs2NaMCl6 double perovskites. Exchange-correlation potentials are figured out by GGA, GGA + U-eff and GGA + mBJ methods to obtain more precise electromagnetic structure of these materials. The energy optimization, mechanical stability test and tolerance factor confirms the stability of these compounds in cubic Fm-3m structure. The spin polarized band structure and density of states signify the half-metallic character of materials. The unpaired electrons in the crystal field splitted d-orbitals of Ti and V are responsible for origin of half-metallic ferromagnetic nature of materials. The behavior of transport parameters of spin up and down channels further confirms half-metallic character of materials. The variation in ZT with the chemical potential demonstrates pronounced peaks on either sides of Fermi level which can attain high values close to unity. The 100% spin polarization and high value of ZT convey that Cs2NaMCl6 (M = Ti, V) double perovskites could find applications in spintronic and thermoelectric technologies. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available