4.7 Article

Confirmation of multiple endotypes in atopic dermatitis based on serum biomarkers

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 1, Pages 189-198

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.062

Keywords

Atopic dermatitis; endotypes; clusters; biomarkers; prediction; personalized medicine; principal components analysis

Funding

  1. Regeneron
  2. Sanofi Genzyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is highly heterogeneous and can be stratified into biomarker-based endotypes. Through biomarker analysis, we identified four distinct clusters of AD patients, suggesting the potential for personalized therapies based on immunopathology.
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly heterogeneous disease, both clinically and biologically, whereas patients are still being treated according to a one-size-fits-allapproach. Stratification of patients into biomarker-based endotypes is important for future development of personalized therapies. Objective: Our aim was to confirm previously defined serum biomarker-based patient clusters in a new cohort of patients with AD. Methods: A panel of 143 biomarkers was measured by using Luminex technology in serum samples from 146 patients with severe AD (median Eczema Area and Severity Index = 28.3; interquartile range = 25.2-35.3). Principal components analysis followed by unsupervised k-means cluster analysis of the biomarker data was used to identify patient clusters. A prediction model was built on the basis of a previous cohort to predict the 1 of the 4 previously identified clusters to which the patients of our new cohort would belong. Results: Cluster analysis identified 4 serum biomarker-based clusters, 3 of which (clusters B, C, and D) were comparable to the previously identified clusters. Cluster A (33.6%) could be distinguished from the other clusters as being a skin-homing chemokines/IL-1R1-dominantcluster, whereas cluster B (18.5%) was a T(H)1/T(H)2/T(H)17-dominantcluster, cluster C (18.5%) was a T(H)2/T(H)22/PARC-dominantcluster, and cluster D (29.5%) was a T(H)2/eosinophil-inferiorcluster. Additionally, by using a prediction model based on our previous cohort we accurately assigned the new cohort to the 4 previously identified clusters by including only 10 selected serum biomarkers. Conclusion: We confirmed that AD is heterogeneous at the immunopathologic level and identified 4 distinct biomarker-based clusters, 3 of which were comparable with previously identified clusters. Cluster membership could be predicted with a model including 10 serum biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available