4.5 Article

Risk factors of thigh pain following total hip arthroplasty with short, tapered-wedge stem

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 2553-2558

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04762-z

Keywords

THA; Thigh pain; Femoral bone shape; Physical activity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The occurrence of thigh pain following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be dependent on multiple factors, which may differ with design of the prosthesis. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the frequency of thigh pain following cementless THA using a short, tapered-wedge stem to identify risk factors for thigh pain. Methods This retrospective cohort study analysed 222 joints of patients who underwent THA with a short, tapered-wedge stem. Thigh pain was evaluated using a questionnaire during each follow-up visit, and the clinical and radiographic assessments were compared. Results Thigh pain occurred in 37 patients (16.7%) during the follow-up period. The pain started two to 24 months after THA. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher University of California, Los Angeles, activity rating (odds ratio 7.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-17.2); Dorr type C femoral bone shape (odds ratio 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.0); and stem tip-cortical bone contact (odds ratio 8.2; 95% CI 2.3-29.4) were significant risk factors of thigh pain following THA. Post-operatively, cortical hypertrophy at Gruen zone 4 was significantly found in patients with thigh pain (pvalue = 0.032). Conclusion Risk factors of pain following THA with short, tapered-wedge stem were high activity level, Dorr type C femoral bone shape, and stem tip contacting the distal bone surface. Moreover, post-operative cortical hypertrophy at the distal stem tip significantly increased the incidence of thigh pain. Therefore, we must pay attention to the aforementioned factors to avoid post-operative thigh pain when using a short, tapered-wedge stem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available