4.6 Article

Dynamic susceptibility mapping of slow-moving landslides using PSInSAR

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 41, Issue 19, Pages 7509-7529

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2020.1760398

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41372370, 41572274]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ02D020001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A landslide susceptibility map (LSM) is a valuable tool for landslide assessment and land use management. This research proposes a landslide susceptibility dynamic map (DLSM) to increase LSM utility and update the predicted map in a time series. Slope units, as basic mapping units, were produced to define the landslide boundaries and simplify the mapping in the DLSM. The permanent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar (PSInSAR) technique was used to estimate the line of sight velocity (V-los). This was then reprojected into the velocity in the steepest slope direction (V-slope) to avoid the influence of geometric distortion. The DLSM was produced by integrating, using slope unit aggregate values, the susceptibility (probability) of landsliding predicted by logistic regression based on eight spatial covariates and theV(slope)predicted using the PSInSAR technique. The DLSM is a dynamically changing susceptibility map in which susceptibility is increased in certain months, particularly where surface velocity increases following the rainy season. The proportion of the study area classified with extremely high susceptibility increased from 22.2% to 44.8% after the rainy season. The DLSM, thus, potentially improves the prediction reliability for slow-moving landslides and, in particular, can help to avoid false negatives. The DLSM can be applied in areas for which radar data are available and can provide more reliable and readily interpretable results to decision-makers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available