4.7 Article

ERGO2: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Calorie-Restricted Ketogenic Diet and Fasting in Addition to Reirradiation for Malignant Glioma

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Senckenberg Foundation
  2. University Cancer Center Frankfurt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: ERGO2 is the first randomized clinical trial on a calorically restricted ketogenic diet (KD) and intermittent fasting (KD-IF) in addition to reirradiation for recurrent malignant gliomas. Methods and Materials: Fifty patients were randomized 1:1 to reirradiation combined with either a calorically unrestricted diet or KD-IF. The KD-IF schedule included 3 days of KD (21-23 kcal/kg/d), followed by 3 days of fasting and again 3 days of KD. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS6). Secondary endpoints were PFS, local PFS, overall survival (OS), frequency of epileptic seizures, rate of ketosis and quality of life. Results: Four patients quit the trial before treatment and 3 patients stopped KD-IF prematurely. Of the 20 patients who completed KD-IF, 17 patients developed ketosis at day 6 and glucose levels declined significantly. KD-IF was well-tolerated with a modest weight loss of -2.1 +/- 1.8 kg. No severe adverse events attributable to the diet occurred. PFS6 was not significantly different between the 2 groups (KD-IF: 20%; calorically unrestricted diet: 16%). Similarly, no difference in PFS, local PFS6, or OS was observable. Explorative analysis revealed that patients in the KD-IF group who had a glucose level of less than the median (83.5 mg/dL) on day 6 had significantly longer PFS and OS compared with those above the median (P < .05). Conclusions: KD-IF is feasible and effective in inducing ketosis in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent glioma. However, the short schedule reported here failed to increase the efficacy of reirradiation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available