4.4 Article

How many times do I need to see to believe? The impact of intolerance of uncertainty and exposure experience on safety-learning and retention in young adults

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages 8-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.012

Keywords

Threat acquisition; Safety-learning; Safety-retention; Intolerance of uncertainty; Skin conductance; Pupil dilation

Funding

  1. NARSAD from the Brain and Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, USA [27567]
  2. ESRC New Investigator, UK Grant [ES/R01145/1]
  3. ESRC Future Leaders Grant [ES/L010119/1]
  4. ESRC [ES/R011451/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals who score high in self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) display difficulties updating threat associations to safe associations. Here we sought to determine whether individuals who score high in IU can learn and retain new safety associations if given more exposure. We recorded skin conductance response, pupil dilation and expectancy ratings during an associative threat learning task with acquisition, same-day extinction and next-day extinction phases. Participants (n = 144) were assigned to either a regular exposure (32 trials of same-day and next-day extinction) or extended exposure condition (48 trials of same-day and next-day extinction). We failed to replicate previous work showing that IU is associated with poorer safety-learning indexed via SCR. We found preliminary evidence for promoted safety-retention in individuals with higher Inhibitory IU in the extended exposure condition, relative to individuals with higher Inhibitory IU in the regular exposure condition, indexed via SCR. These findings further our current understanding of the role of IU in safety-learning and -retention, informing models of IU and exposure-based treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available