4.7 Article

Tuning the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of irinotecan (IRI) loaded gelatin nanoparticles through folate conjugation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 586, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119522

Keywords

Protein nanoparticles; Gelatin; Folate conjugation; Nanomedicine; Pharmacokinetics; Tumor suppression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gelatin based nanocarriers have major limitation of shorter circulation half-life (t(1/2)). Present study addressed this issue by conjugating gelatin with folate followed by nanoprecipitation in presence of polysorbate 80 to form folate attached gelatin nanoparticles (GNP-F). The folic acid was conjugated with gelatin through the formation of amide linkage with a maximum conjugation yield of similar to 69%. Cryo-SEM analysis indicated that unconjugated gelatin nanoparticles (GNP) and GNP-F were spherical of nearly identical size of similar to 200 nm. The irinotecan (IRI)-loading efficiency estimated for IRI-GNP and IRI-GNP-F was 6.6 +/- 0.42% and 11.2 +/- 0.73% respectively and both formulations showed faster release of IRI at acidic pH (similar to 5) than at physiological pH (similar to 7). Further IRI-GN-PF demonstrated significantly higher cytotoxicity in folate receptor (FR)-positive HeLa cells than the unconjugated IRI-GNP nanoparticles confirming active targeting. Subsequently the antitumor activity of above formulations in FR-positive fibrosarcoma (syngeneic) tumor-bearing mice followed the order of IRI-GNP-F > IRI-GNP > free IRI. The pharmacokinetic evaluation of IRI-GNP and IRI-GNP-F revealed that encapsulation of IRI within GNP without folate improved its plasma maximum concentration (C-max). However, folate conjugation of GNP remarkably improved the t(1/2) of IRI. Taken together, folate as a targeting ligand modulates the pharmacokinetic property of IRI loaded GNP to favor active verses passive targeting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available