4.7 Article

Intranasal tetrandrine temperature-sensitive in situ hydrogels for the treatment of microwave-induced brain injury

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 583, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119384

Keywords

Brain targeting; Microwave; In situ hydrogels; Temperature-sensitive; Intranasal administration; Blood-brain barrier (BBB)

Funding

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7202147]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472951]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The brain is the most sensitive organ to microwave radiation. However, few effective drugs are available for the treatment of microwave-induced brain injury due to the poor drug permeation into the brain. Here, intranasal tetrandrine (TET) temperature-sensitive in situ hydrogels (ISGs) were prepared with poloxamers 407 and 188. Its characteristics were evaluated, including rheological properties, drug release in vitro, and mucosal irritation. The pharmacodynamics and brain-targeting effects were also studied. The highly viscous ISGs remained in the nasal cavity for a long time with the sustained release of TET and no obvious ciliary toxicity. Intranasal temperaturesensitive TET ISGs markedly improved the spatial memory and spontaneous exploratory behavior induced by microwave with the Morris water maze (MWM) and the open field test (OFT) compared to the model. The ISGs alleviated the microwave-induced brain damage and inhibited the certain mRNA expressions of calcium channels in the brain. Intranasal temperature-sensitive TET ISGs was rapidly absorbed with a shorter T-max (4.8 h) compared to that of oral TET (8.4 h). The brain targeting index of intranasal temperature-sensitive TET ISGs was as 2.26 times as that of the oral TET. Intranasal temperature-sensitive TET ISGs are a promising brain-targeted medication for the treatment of microwave-induced brain injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available