Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Potential secondary poisoning risks to non-targets from a sodium nitrite toxic bait for invasive wild pigs
Nathan P. Snow et al.
PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2018)
Research Priorities for Managing Invasive Wild Pigs in North America
James C. Beasley et al.
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (2018)
Field evaluation of low-dose warfarin baits to control wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North Texas
Richard M. Poche et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs
Nathan P. Snow et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2017)
Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options
Carlotta A. Caplenor et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2017)
Development of the National Feral Swine Map, 1982-2016
Joseph L. Corn et al.
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN (2017)
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014
Peter Achterberg et al.
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2017)
Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states
Aaron Anderson et al.
CROP PROTECTION (2016)
Stakeholder Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Wild Pigs in Georgia and Illinois
Erin E. Harper et al.
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN (2016)
What is in a Common Name? A Call for Consistent Terminology for Nonnative Sus scrofa
David A. Keiter et al.
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN (2016)
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD IN THE EYES OF THE PUBLIC AND EXPERTS
Lennart Sjoberg
RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL (2008)
Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland
Alison Bremner et al.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2007)
Major psychological factors affecting acceptance of gene-recombination technology
Y Tanaka
RISK ANALYSIS (2004)
Share Paper
