4.7 Article

miR-142-3p Expression Is Predictive for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in Trauma Patients

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155381

Keywords

miR-142-3p; miRNA; serum; plasma; SNORD95; traumatic brain injury (TBI); polytrauma; Injury Severity Score (ISS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Predictive biomarkers in biofluids are the most commonly used diagnostic method, but established markers in trauma diagnostics lack accuracy. This study investigates promising microRNAs (miRNA) released from affected tissue after severe trauma that have predictive values for the effects of the injury. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data and blood samples ofn= 33 trauma patients (ISS >= 16) is provided. Levels of miR-9-5p, -124-3p, -142-3p, -219a-5p, -338-3p and -423-3p in severely injured patients (PT) without traumatic brain injury (TBI) or with severe TBI (PT + TBI) and patients with isolated TBI (isTBI) were measured within 6 h after trauma. Results: The highest miR-423-3p expression was detected in patients with severe isTBI, followed by patients with PT + TBI, and lowest levels were found in PT patients without TBI (2(- increment increment Ct),p= 0.009). A positive correlation between miR-423-3p level and increasing AIS(head)(p= 0.001) and risk of mortality (RISC II,p= 0.062) in trauma patients (n= 33) was found. ROC analysis of miR-423-3p levels revealed them as statistically significant to predict the severity of brain injury in trauma patients (p= 0.006). miR-124-3p was only found in patients with severe TBI, miR-338-3p was shown in all trauma groups. miR-9-5p, miR-142-3p and miR-219a-5p could not be detected in any of the four groups. Conclusion: miR-423-3p expression is significantly elevated after isolated traumatic brain injury and predictable for severe TBI in the first hours after trauma. miR-423-3p could represent a promising new biomarker to identify severe isolated TBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available