4.7 Article

Direct observation of pore formation mechanisms during LPBF additive manufacturing process and high energy density laser welding

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103555

Keywords

Laser powder bed fusion; Additive manufacturing; Pore formation; X-ray imaging; Laser welding

Funding

  1. DOE Office of Science, Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Department of Energy's Kansas City National Security Campus Managed by Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies (FMT)
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Honeywell Federal Manufacturing Technologies [DENA0002839]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a 3D printing technology that can print parts with complex geometries that are unachievable by conventional manufacturing technologies. However, pores formed during the printing process impair the mechanical performance of the printed parts, severely hindering their widespread application. Here, we report six pore formation mechanisms that were observed during the LPBF process. Our results reconfirm three pore formation mechanisms - keyhole induced pores, pore formation from feedstock powder and pore formation along the melting boundary during laser melting from vaporization of a volatile substance or an expansion of a tiny trapped gas. We also observe three new pore formation mechanisms: (1) pore trapped by surface fluctuation, (2) pore formation due to depression zone fluctuation when the depression zone is shallow and (3) pore formation from a crack. The results presented here provide direct evidence and insight into pore formation mechanisms during the LPBF process, which may guide the development of pore elimination/mitigation approaches. Since certain laser processing conditions studied here are similar to the situations in high energy density laser welding, the results presented here also have implications for laser welding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available