4.7 Article

Therapeutic plasma exchange in adults with severe COVID-19 infection

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 214-218

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.064

Keywords

Plasma exchange; Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19 infection; SARS-CoV-2; Pneumonia; Cytokine release syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic use of plasma exchange in COVID-19 patients compared to controls. Methods: A case series of critically ill adult men and non-pregnant women, >= 18 years of age, with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, was studied at the Royal Hospital, Oman, from April 17 to May 11, 2020. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was performed on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with confirmed or imminent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or severe pneumonia. The analysis was performed using univariate statistics. Results: A total of 31 COVID-19 patients were included with an overall mean age of 51 +/- 15 years (range: 27-76 years); 90% (n = 28) were males, and 35% (n = 11) of the patients had TPE as a mode of treatment. The TPE group was associated with higher extubation rates than the non-TPE cohort ( 73% versus 20%; p = 0.018). Additionally, patients on TPE had a lower 14 days (0 versus 35%; p = 0.033) and 28 days (0 versus 35%; p = 0.033) post plasma exchange mortality compared to patients not on TPE. However, all-cause mortality was only marginally lower in the TPE group compared to the non-TPE group (9.1% versus 45%; p = 0.055; power = 66%). Laboratory and ventilatory parameters also improved post TPE (n = 11). Conclusions: The use of TPE in severe COVID-19 patients has been associated with improved outcomes, however, randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to draw final, conclusive findings. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available