4.7 Article

Hydrocarbon hydrogen carriers for catalytic transfer hydrogenation of guaiacol

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 51, Pages 27381-27391

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.136

Keywords

Transfer hydrogenation; Liquid organic hydrogen carrier; Hydrogen donor; Hydrodeoxygenation; Lignin-derived molecule

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polycyclic hydrocarbons are known to be efficient hydrogen carriers capable of yielding high purity H-2 upon dehydrogenation. Due to their high hydrogen density, high boiling point, and stability, these compounds demonstrate the potential to be used as hydrogen donors under catalytic transfer hydrogenation (CTH) conditions. In this work, the potential of a suite of hydrogen carriers to donate hydrogen, as well as the mechanisms affecting their hydrogen transfer, are assessed through the CTH of guaiacol, on Pd/Al2O3, as a model system. The results indicated the following descending order of transfer hydrogenation rate: bicyclohexyl > tetralin hydrogenated terphenyl (HTP) > cyclohexylbenzene. Among the products, cyclohexanone and phenol are the most abundant, directly resulting from CTH. Detailed analysis of the hydrogen carrier conversion and selectivity clearly shows that the potential for CTH is highly linked to the molecular structure of the donor, rather than the amount of hydrogen available for transfer. A density functional theory (DFT) study, supported by experimental data, reveals that when unsaturated hydrocarbons are utilized, such as tetralin, cyclohexylbenzene, and HTP, the effective CTH rate to guaiacol is limited, despite dehydrogenation being more favorable for those molecules than from fully saturated donors, such as bicyclohexyl. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available