4.7 Article

Interactive heat transfer characteristics of 5 kW class shell-and-tube methane steam reformer with intermediate temperature heat source

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 41, Pages 21767-21778

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.152

Keywords

Shell and tube methane steam reformer; Convection heat transfer; Intermediate temperature heat source; High temperature fuel cell system

Funding

  1. Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program [10082569]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, Korea)
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2017R1A2B4006528]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 5 kW class shell and tube methane steam reformer (MSR) with intermediate temperature heat source was evaluated to find a correlation between the methane conversion and heat transfer performance. First, performance evaluation of MSR1 was conducted by varying experimental conditions such as reformer reactant flow rate, steam to carbon ratio (SCR), inlet temperature of reforming zone, and inlet temperature of heat source. Sensitivity study of overall heat transfer coefficient was also carried out to find the major parameter affecting the heat transfer. Next, the heat transfer performance and methane conversion rate of MSR1 and 2 were compared. Both reformers have the same gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) in the form of shell and tube heat exchangers, but are designed to compare the heat transfer characteristics of the reformer by designing with the different heat transfer areas. The results show that the main factors affecting the performance of the reformer are load, heat source inlet temperature, and heat transfer area. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available