4.7 Article

Impact of pressure on carbon films by PECVD toward high deposition rates and high stability as metallic bipolar plate for PEMFCs

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 32, Pages 16277-16286

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.078

Keywords

PEMFCs; Amorphous carbon coating; PECVD; Deposition pressure; Carbon structure; High deposition rates

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1737214]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0102900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stainless-steel bipolar plates (BPPs) are widely used in place of graphite bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Amorphous hydrogenated carbon (a-C:H) coatings are widely used to improve the conductivity and corrosion resistance of metal bipolar plates. However, a-C:H coatings prepared by the sputtering method cannot be applied to quantity production on account of its low deposition rate. Our paper focuses on a-C:H coatings applied at metallic BPPs for PEMFCs produced by direct-current plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (DC-PECVD) with high deposition rates. The effects of adjusting deposition pressures on the structure and properties of coatings have been investigated. The results show that the a-C:H coating deposited at 8 Pa deposition pressure have high stability, with a high deposition rate of 37.5 nm/min. As the deposition pressure increased, sp(2)-hybridized carbon atoms increased, the larger microcrystalline carbon clusters are found, and the structure will undergo different structural transformations in a-C:H coatings. Overall, the a-C:H coatings deposited at 8 Pa are attractive to be applied in metallic bipolar plate with have high deposition rates, dense coating structure, and proper carbon structure. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available