4.5 Article

Biomarker-based validity of a food frequency questionnaire estimating intake in Brazilian children and adolescents

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2020.1786026

Keywords

Food frequency questionnaire; validation study; biomarker; child; adolescent

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [131220/2015-2]
  2. Nestle Institute of Health Sciences (NIHS) [RDHS 000054]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/20421-8]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/20421-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the validity of nutrient and food group intake estimated by an FFQ against biomarkers in Brazilian children and adolescents aged 9-13 years. Results showed correlations between nutrient intake and biomarkers, indicating the FFQ is a valid tool for ranking individuals based on their intake of various nutrients and food groups.
This study evaluated the validity of nutrient and food group intakes estimated by an FFQ against biomarkers. A 71-item semiquantitative FFQ was administered to 210 Brazilian children and adolescents aged 9-13 years. Intakes were correlated with biomarkers in plasma and red blood cells. Correlations between nutrients and their biomarkers were presented for animal protein, myristic acid (C14:0), EPA, DHA, beta-carotene, folate, and vitamins B3, B5 and B6. Food groups and biomarkers were correlated as follows: fish products with EPA and DHA; milk and dairy with C14:0, pyridoxal 5'-phosphate and vitamin B12; total vegetables and dark green and orange vegetables with beta-carotene; 5-methyltetrahydrofolate with green vegetables; and flour products with para-aminobenzoylglutamic acid. This FFQ is a valid tool for ranking Brazilian children and adolescents according to their intake of several nutrients and food groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available