4.7 Article

Optimal energy management strategy offuel-cellbattery hybrid electric mining truck to achieve minimum lifecycle operation costs

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 13, Pages 10797-10808

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5728

Keywords

adaptive control; battery ESS; energy management strategy; fuel cell electric vehicle; hybrid electric mining truck; overall cost minimization; performance degradation

Funding

  1. Dennis AMP
  2. Phyllis Washington Foundation
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) electric vehicle is an effective solution for improving fuel efficiency and onboard emissions, taking advantage of the high energy density and short refuelling time. However, the higher cost and short life of the PEMFC system and battery in an electric vehicle prohibit the fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) from becoming the mainstream transportation solution. The fuel efficiency-oriented energy management strategy (EMS) cannot guarantee the improvement of total operating costs. This paper proposes an EMS to minimize the overall operation costs of FCEVs, including the cost of hydrogen fuel, as well as the cost associated with the degradations of the PEMFC system and battery energy storage system (ESS). Based on the PEMFC and battery performance degradation models, their remaining useful life (RUL) models are introduced. The control parameters of the EMS are then optimized using a meta-model based global optimization algorithm. This study presents a new optimal control method for a large mining truck operating on a real closed-road operation cycle, using the combined energy efficiency and performance degradation cost measures of the PEMFC system and lithium-ion battery ESS. Simulation results showed that the proposed EMS could improve the total operating costs and the life of the FCEV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available