4.4 Article

Simultaneous Electrochemiluminescence Determination of Sinomenine, Cepharanthine and Tetrahydropalmatine in Stephania epigaea by Capillary Electrophoresis Coupled with Ultrasonic-Assisted Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 5002-5017

Publisher

ESG
DOI: 10.20964/2020.06.33

Keywords

Capillary electrophoresis; Electrochemiluminescence; Aqueous two-phase; Ultrasonic extraction; Stephania epigaea

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21765004]
  2. Hunan Science Foundation of China [2018JJ2363]
  3. Guangxi Science Foundation of China [2019GXNSFAA245076]
  4. Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education [YCSZ2013039]
  5. State Key Laboratory for Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources (Guangxi Normal University) [CMEMR2018-C18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three alkaloids in Stephania epigaea were extracted using ultrasonic-assisted extraction in an aqueous two-phase system. Based on separation by CE with acetonitrile as an additive, this work first established a simple and sensitive CE-ECL method for simultaneous determination of sinomenine, cepharanthine and tetrahydropalmatine in Stephania epigaea. The experimental conditions were optimized. The three alkaloids had the highest extraction rates in the aqueous two-phase system compared with the other extraction solutions studied in this paper. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the three alkaloids were optimally separated within 10 min and displayed linear concentration ranges for sinomenine, cepharanthine and tetrahydropalmatine of 0.08-4.0 mu g/mL, 0.08-4.0 mu g/mL and 0.04-6.0 mu g/mL, respectively. The detection limits of sinomenine, cepharanthine and tetrahydropalmatine (S/N=3) were 0.027, 0.024 and 0.013 mu g/mL, respectively. This method was successfully applied for the determination of sinomenine, cepharanthine and tetrahydropalmatine in Stephania epigaea extracts with recoveries of 98.4%, 102.4% and 101.1%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available