4.2 Article

Report of novel genetic variation in NPHS2 gene associated with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in South Indian children

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 127-133

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-016-1237-0

Keywords

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; NPHS2 mutations; Polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is found in 10-20 % of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). In SRNS patients, common histopathological subtypes are Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (53 %) and minimal change disease (MCD) (27 %). Familial forms of FSGS constitute podocyte diseases with varying severity and age of onset. Podocin gene (NPHS2) mutations cause childhood-onset steroid-resistant FSGS and MCD to adult-onset FSGS. In view of genetic variations and susceptibility to the disease, the present investigation was undertaken to study the pattern of genetic mutation in children from South India. Methods Mutation analysis was carried out by direct sequencing of the entire NPHS2 gene (eight exons) using specific primers in 200 INS (100 SRNS and 100 steroid sensitive) children and 100 healthy controls. The allele and genotype frequencies of NPHS2 gene were calculated for both cases and controls as per Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Results Among the SRNS patients, 18 % revealed both heterozygous and homozygous mutations. Out of 12 mutations, 8 were homozygous and 4 were heterozygous. Interestingly, we found two novel SNPs in exon 4 of NPHS2 gene, which are documented and submitted to dbsnp database (Ref rs12401711 and rs12401708). Conclusion Mutational analysis of NPHS2 would be advisable at the start of treatment. The genetic variations detected in the study would serve as the important molecular marker in treating the children's at early stage, which also enables to detect carriers, prenatal diagnosis and provide genetic counseling to couples at risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available