4.6 Article

The impact of physical activity on healthy ageing trajectories: evidence from eight cohort studies

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-00995-8

Keywords

Growth mixture modelling; Lifestyle behaviours; Health metric; Data harmonisation; Physical activity

Funding

  1. five-year Ageing Trajectories of Health: Longitudinal Opportunities and Synergies (ATHLOS) project
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [635316]
  3. South Australian Health Commission
  4. Australian Rotary Health Research Fund
  5. US National Institute on Aging [AG 08523-02]
  6. Office for the Ageing (SA)
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC 22922]
  8. Premiers Science Research Fund (SA)
  9. Australian Research Council [DP0879152, DP130100428]
  10. Sanofi-Aventis
  11. Ministry of Health of Spain
  12. FIS grant [12/1166]
  13. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  14. U.S. National Institute of Aging
  15. National Centre for Social Research
  16. University College London (UCL)
  17. Institute for Fiscal Studies
  18. National Institute on Aging [NIA U01AG009740]
  19. Social Security Administration
  20. Korea Employment Information Service (KEIS)
  21. Korea Labor Institute's KLOSA Team
  22. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging [NIH R01AG018016]
  23. INEGI in Mexico
  24. European Commission through FP5 [QLK6-CT-200100360]
  25. European Commission through FP6 [SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812]
  26. European Commission through FP7 [211909, 227822, 261982]
  27. German Ministry of Education and Research
  28. Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science
  29. U.S. National Institute on Aging [U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-AG-455301, IAG_BSR06-11, OGHA_04-064, HHSN271201300071C]
  30. MRC [MR/K021907/1]
  31. Elderly Citizens Homes (SA)
  32. MRC [MR/K021907/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Research has suggested the positive impact of physical activity on health and wellbeing in older age, yet few studies have investigated the associations between physical activity and heterogeneous trajectories of healthy ageing. We aimed to identify how physical activity can influence healthy ageing trajectories using a harmonised dataset of eight ageing cohorts across the world. Methods Based on a harmonised dataset of eight ageing cohorts in Australia, USA, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, and Europe, comprising 130,521 older adults (M-age = 62.81,SDage = 10.06) followed-up up to 10 years (Mfollow-up = 5.47,SDfollow-up = 3.22),we employed growth mixture modelling to identify latent classes of people with different trajectories of healthy ageing scores, which incorporated 41 items of health and functioning. Multinomial logistic regression modelling was used to investigate the associations between physical activity and different types of trajectories adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and other lifestyle behaviours. Results Three latent classes of healthy ageing trajectories were identified: two with stable trajectories with high (71.4%) or low (25.2%) starting points and one with a high starting point but a fast decline over time (3.4%). Engagement in any level of physical activity was associated with decreased odds of being in the low stable (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.19) and fast decline trajectories groups (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.50) compared to the high stable trajectory group. These results were replicated with alternative physical activity operationalisations, as well as in sensitivity analyses using reduced samples. Conclusions Our findings suggest a positive impact of physical activity on healthy ageing, attenuating declines in health and functioning. Physical activity promotion should be a key focus of healthy ageing policies to prevent disability and fast deterioration in health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available