4.5 Article

Circulating T cells to infliximab are detectable mainly in treated patients developing anti-drug antibodies and hypersensitivity reactions

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 3, Pages 364-372

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cei.12858

Keywords

allergy; arthritis; cytokines; T cells

Categories

Funding

  1. ABIRISK project from Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) [115303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibodies recognizing infliximab (IFX) may develop in a proportion of treated patients, leading to loss of response or hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). T cell response to IFX has been poorly investigated. This paper was addressed to detect IFX-specific T cells in treated patients with inflammatory diseases developing, or not, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and to correlate the presence of specific T cells with the clinical outcomes of the treatment. A co-culture system of IFX-loaded dendritic cells and purified autologous CD4(+) T cells was used to detect memory T cells in 32 ADA(+) and 39 ADA(-) IFX-treated patients and control groups. The cytokine profile of IFX-specific T cells was also studied in culture supernatants. IFX-specific cell proliferation was detected mainly in cells from ADA(+) patients, irrespective of their different diseases. HR patients displayed higher T cell proliferation than non-responder and tolerant patients. A mixed [interferon (IFN)-, interleukin (IL)-13, IL-10] cytokine profile was shown in cells from ADA(+) patients, while IL-10 was the most frequently detected cytokine in the supernatants of cultures from ADA- patients. Immunoglobulin (Ig)E(+)ADA(+) patients with previous HRs exhibited a more pronounced type 2 profile than IgE(-)ADA(+) patients. This work provides evidence that IFX-specific circulating T cells are detectable mainly in ADA(+) patients with HRs, regardless of their disease. The IFX-induced cytokine pattern partially correlates with the ADA isotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available